Visual abstract

From Sound to Science: Enhancing Transparency in Music-Based Therapeutic Research

The growing emphasis on transparency in health research has underscored the pivotal role of rigorous reporting standards. Initiatives like the EQUATOR network were established in 2006 to enhance the quality and transparency of health research, and emphasize that replicability is foundational to research integrity. Yet despite such efforts, replicability is often compromised when studies lack sufficient reporting detail, thereby eroding trust in the reported outcomes.

In this landscape, music therapy occupies a distinctive position. Unlike disciplines named after their therapeutic targets (e.g., speech therapy, physical therapy), music therapy is defined by its medium (i.e., music functions) as both the therapeutic agent and the structural framework for diverse human health needs. The discipline stands on 3 interwoven pillars: theory, practice, and research. Music’s therapeutic potential is inseparable from how it is used, studied, and understood across these dimensions. Research provides evidence-based scaffolding for understanding how specific musical elements contribute to meaningful shifts in physical, emotional, cognitive, and social states.

Along this line, use of music, for therapeutic needs and purpose, has prompted concerns about whether the discipline risks becoming “wide and thin.” Yet such concerns overlook music’s innate complexity and capacity to address multifaceted human needs. Rather than debating whether music can be therapeutic, the more vital task of refining how the integral traits of music can be structured and demonstrated, through systematic research, is overlooked.

A significant stride in this direction was the 2011 introduction of the Reporting Guidelines for Music-Based Interventions (RG-MBIs) by Robb et al [1]. Though not yet universally adopted, these guidelines prompted researchers and clinicians to prioritize fidelity, theoretical rationale, and replicability in intervention studies. The newly revised version of the RG-MBIs reflects a comprehensive update, developed through a field scan, Delphi surveys, and expert panel consultations which were an inclusive process that amplified the perspectives of therapists, researchers, and practitioners working with music-based interventions [2].

The updated RG-MBIs specify twelve essential reporting components, including the intervention name, scientific rationale, content, facilitator qualifications, format, setting, schedule, and treatment fidelity [3]. Importantly, the research team also produced an annotated example applying these standards, along with supplementary materials outlining the methodological steps used to finalize the framework. These additions bridge the gap between theoretical guidelines and practical implementation.

Central to this commentary is the idea that music’s therapeutic potential is rooted in its temporality and experiential nature. As a time-based art form, music unfolds gradually whether through listening or performing, and this unfolding creates opportunities for transformation. Music begins as an auditory vibroacoustic stimulation but, through sequential structure and duration, engages the ‘whole person’ concepts. Its impact is not 1-dimensional; rhythm, melody, harmony, texture, and timbre each contribute to its therapeutic force. Despite this richness, many studies still treat music as a generic concept, neglecting to detail its intra-musical components, and the specifics of musical exposure provided in an intervention context. For example, “Over the Rainbow” played on a piano versus an electric guitar would likely evoke distinct emotional responses or cognitive associations/recall. Though the melody is identical, the instruments’ timbral differences can dramatically alter the listener’s experience

With digital health initiatives gaining traction, the replicability of intervention protocols, especially music’s therapeutic mechanisms, becomes critical. The expanding application of music therapy from clinical treatment to everyday wellness benefits individuals in regulating mood, easing stress, and improving sleep. In these cases, clearly operationalized musical inputs are essential to evoke precise physiological and emotional responses. Identifying the musical components that trigger those responses is key in advancing research rigor in both clinical and everyday settings.

In this expanding landscape, the RG-MBIs serve not only credentialed music therapists but also other professionals who integrate music into their healthcare models. The guidelines provide a quality interdisciplinary framework for elevating the precision, consistency, and impact of music-based interventions across healthcare domains. As music continues to evolve into a strategic tool for wellness, clarity in its use will be what separates informed practice from generalized assumption. The studies by Robb et al [2,3] in 2025, mark a vital leap forward bringing the field closer to a shared evidence-based therapeutic utilization of music.

Article information

Conflicts of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

None.

Author Use of AI Tools Statement

AI was used to refine the final version of this article for grammar and spelling errors.

Ethical Statement

This research did not involve any human or animal experiments.

Data Availability

References

• [1] Robb SL, Burns DS, Carpenter JS. Reporting guidelines for music-based interventions. J Health Psychol 2011;16(2):342−52.ArticlePubMedPDF
• [2] Robb SL, Springs S, Edwards E, Golden TL, Johnson JK, Burns DS, et al. Reporting guidelines for music-based intervention: an update and validation study. Integr Med Res 2025;14(3):101199. PubMedPMC
• [3] Robb SL, Story KM, Harman E, Burns DS, Bradt J, Edwards E, et al. Reporting guidelines for music-based interventions checklist: explanation and elaboration guide. Integr Med Res 2025;14(3):101200. ArticlePubMedPMC

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by